2026-local-elections-taiwan

On November 28, 2026, at 8:00 AM sharp on a Saturday.

From Heping Island in Keelung to Eluanbi in Pingtung, from Jincheng in Kinmen to Orchid Island in Taitung, all 22 special municipalities and counties (cities) across Taiwan will open their polling stations in the same hour. From special municipality mayors to village (里) chiefs, from councilors to indigenous district representatives, nine categories of office will be voted on in a single day¹, affecting a total of over 11,000 elected executive and representative positions². This is the literal meaning of "nine-in-one" — nine types of elections held on the same day.

Once every four years, this ritual repeats. The first direct election of special municipality mayors in 1994, the first nine-in-one after the five-municipality upgrade in 2010, the pattern set after Taoyuan's upgrade in 2014, the election administration collapse when referendums were bundled with elections in 2018, and the post-pandemic election amid ruling-opposition confrontation in 2022. Each one has been a routine checkup on Taiwan's democracy.

But the 2026 edition is unlike any before it.

The difference is not the candidates — candidates coming and going is the normal state of democracy. The difference is the environment in which this election takes place.

A report released by OpenAI in February 2026 revealed that the CCP has established a state-level AI cognitive warfare system³. Citizen Lab disclosed in the same year that 123+ spoofed news websites are spreading disinformation in multiple languages⁴. Taiwan's Ministry of Justice has listed AI disinformation as one of four key priorities for 2026 election investigations (vote-buying, gambling operations, AI disinformation, and foreign interference)⁵. Japan's Yomiuri Shimbun reported that the Xi Jinping regime is targeting the 2028 election to prevent Lai Ching-te's reelection, treating the 2026 local elections as a "preliminary battle"⁶.

Whether Taiwan's democratic infrastructure can withstand this stress test will not be determined on election day alone. The answer is being built, inch by inch, right now — 18 months before the election — in every institution, every civic tool, every fact-checking organization, and every citizen willing to spend a weekend at a polling station.

This article is the "general chapter" of the 2026 elections. It is not an election information roundup (that is the job of the /elections/2026/ dynamic page); it is the curatorial narrative, historical positioning, and structural pressure analysis of this election. Written for someone reading five years from now, to understand why 2026 was a critical node for Taiwan's democracy.

I. Basic Election Information: Timeline and Scale

The Central Election Commission's announced statutory timeline for the 2026 local official elections is as follows[^7]:

Date	Procedure
2026/08/20	Official announcement (election launch)
2026/08/29–09/04	Candidate registration
2026/10/16	Candidate qualification review
2026/10/23	Candidate number lottery
2026/11/28 (Sat)	Election day (08:00–16:00)

Scale of the nine categories of office¹[^8]:

Office	Seats
Special municipality mayors	6
Special municipality councilors	380
County (city) mayors	16
County (city) councilors	532
Township (city) mayors	198
Township (city) representatives	2,148
Mountain indigenous district mayors (special muni.)	6
Mountain indigenous district representatives	50
Village (里) chiefs	7,748
Total	~11,084

A single ballot is not enough — each voter will receive multiple ballots at the polling station corresponding to their district eligibility, from special municipality mayor to village chief, each in a different color. For voters in mountain indigenous districts such as Fuxin in Taoyuan, Wulai in New Taipei, and Namasia in Kaohsiung, they will additionally receive ballots for district mayor and district representatives. This is the literal complexity of "nine-in-one."

For election administration, this is a quadrennial logistics nightmare: ballot printing, polling station setup, vote-counting staff training, and live broadcast of tally calls — every step must be completed within a single working day. Taiwan's election system has long been described by international observers as "one of the fastest vote-counting democracies in the world," and the reason is not technology but institutions: hand-written ballots, manual counting, simultaneous live broadcast of tally calls, on-site party poll watchers, and the standard operating procedure of "one person, one ballot, one action" for election staff⁷.

See also: 九合一選舉是什麼 (What Are the Nine-in-One Elections) · 選舉公報 (Election Gazette) · 中選會制度 (Central Election Commission System)

II. Historical Positioning: Finding This Election's Place on a Thirty-Year Coordinate

To understand why 2026 matters, one must first understand its position on the coordinate of Taiwan's electoral history.

The 11th special municipality mayor election since the first direct elections in Taipei and Kaohsiung in 1994. The third constitutional amendment in 1994 passed the Provincial and County Self-Government Act and the Special Municipality Self-Government Act, changing the mayors of Taipei and Kaohsiung from appointed to elected, reconnecting a democratic path that had been severed for 27 years. From 1994 to 2026, a full 32 years and 11 rounds of special municipality mayor elections — this system has been operating continuously for more than a generation⁸.

The 4th nine-in-one since the five-municipality upgrade in 2010. In 2010, Taipei County was upgraded to New Taipei City, Taichung County and City merged into a special municipality, Tainan County and City merged into a special municipality, Kaohsiung County and City merged into a special municipality, along with the original Taipei and Kaohsiung, forming the "five municipalities." In 2014, Taoyuan was upgraded, creating today's "six municipalities" structure. The term "nine-in-one" only came into widespread use in 2014 — before that, local elections were held on separate dates. Consolidating all local offices into a single day was itself a product of the major electoral system overhaul in 2010.

The first midterm test after the 2024 general election. In January 2024, the presidential and legislative elections were held on the same day. The DPP retained the presidency but lost its Legislative Yuan majority, and the legislature entered a "ruling minority, opposition majority" configuration. From that moment, 2026 was viewed by all sides as a midterm vote of confidence in the ruling party. Whether central government governance, Legislative Yuan conflicts, and executive-legislative tensions would be reflected in voters' choices of local executives and councilors — this is the classic question of midterm elections.

The preliminary battle for the 2028 general election. Japan's Yomiuri Shimbun reported that the CCP views the 2026 local elections as a "preliminary battle" to prevent Lai Ching-te's reelection⁶. Regardless of whether this framing aligns with how Taiwan's voters themselves interpret the election, external actors have already treated 2026 as a rehearsal for 2028. Whether this external narrative will in turn affect the issue framing of the 2026 campaign itself is a question worth tracking.

The continuation after the 2025 Great Recall. In 2025, citizen groups launched the largest recall campaign in history, with 1.3 million signatures⁹. The political energy, civic organizational capacity, street mobilization experience, and how this movement carries over or transforms in 2026 is another line of observation. The recall itself targeted individual legislators, but the accumulated civic awareness will diffuse into voting behavior in local elections.

None of these five historical coordinates have reached their conclusion. 2026 is not the endpoint of these stories — it is their next node.

For detailed historical context, see: Taiwan Democratization · Taiwan's Democratic Transition · The Great Recall Movement (2024–2025) · Taiwan Elections and Party Politics

III. Why This Election Is Different: Three Layers of External Pressure

External interference has shadowed Taiwan's elections for the past thirty years — the 1996 Taiwan Strait missile crisis, the 2000 "Shanghai Central Radio" broadcasts, the alleged cyber-army operations behind the Han Kuo-yu phenomenon in 2018. But the external pressure facing 2026 is of a different order, primarily because advances in AI technology have caused the cost of cognitive warfare to plummet, its scale to surge, and the difficulty of tracking it to spike.

(1) AI Cognitive Warfare: From Manual Cyber Armies to Industrialization

A report released by OpenAI in February 2026 revealed³ that the CCP has established a state-level AI cognitive warfare system, with at least 300+ "cyber special operations" operators in a single province, thousands of fake accounts, and over 100 tactics, listing Taiwan as one of the primary targets. What makes this report distinctive is that it is not an accusation from Taiwan itself — it is OpenAI identifying systematic behavior across multiple actors while tracking abuse patterns of its own API.

DoubleThink Lab in Taiwan simultaneously released an analysis of internal documents from "Zhongke Tianji"¹⁰, revealing how Chinese military think tanks incorporate large language models into influence operation frameworks. Nine key points include: automated narrative generation, cross-platform distribution, precision customization targeting local issues, inserting disinformation into local forums and communities, using AI translation to reach non-Chinese-speaking audiences, and using voice synthesis to produce fake videos.

Once this infrastructure matures, every special municipality mayor election, every county (city) mayor candidate, every local councilor could become the target of individually customized attacks. Past cyber armies targeted "Taiwan as a whole"; future AI cognitive warfare targets "specific districts, specific candidates, specific issues" with precision.

This is not science fiction — it is the real attack surface of the 2026 election.

(2) Spoofed News Websites: Industrialized Replication of Fake Media

A 2026 investigation by Citizen Lab revealed 123+ spoofed news websites spanning multiple languages, platforms, and topics⁴. The design logic of these websites: copy the layout of real news sites, randomly mix true and false content, optimize for SEO so search engines index them, and use fake social media accounts to amplify — creating the illusion that "this report comes from multiple independent sources."

Some spoofed websites specifically target Taiwan election narratives — mimicking the layout of Taiwan's domestic media, using Traditional Chinese, and publishing political commentary that appears to be from a local perspective but is in fact carefully designed. For the average voter, distinguishing "this is a real Taiwan media outlet" from "this is a spoofed website imitating Taiwan media" requires a level of digital literacy an order of magnitude higher than before.

(3) Ministry of Justice's Four Key Investigation Priorities: Listing AI Disinformation as a Formal Election Crime Category

The Ministry of Justice has defined four categories of election investigation priorities for 2026[^5]:

Vote-buying — traditional cash-for-votes
Gambling operations — manipulating public opinion through betting
AI disinformation — deepfake audio/video, generative text, customized attacks
Foreign interference — cross-border coordinated operations, external funding, overseas cyber armies

The third category, "AI disinformation," is the first time in Taiwan's election investigation history that this category has been independently listed as a key investigation priority — in the past, AI disinformation was scattered across vaguer legal provisions such as "false statements" or "spreading rumors," and was not treated as an independent investigation category. This adjustment itself is an institutional response to external pressure — the Ministry of Justice acknowledging that traditional tools are insufficient and that dedicated investigation units are needed.

See also: 政治獻金透明度 (Political Donation Transparency) · Cognitive warfare-related reporting

IV. Internal Structural Issues: Ruling Minority, Blue-White Cooperation, Third Forces

Beyond external pressure, the 2026 election is layered on top of structural tensions already present in Taiwan's representative democracy.

Continuation of the Ruling Minority Configuration

After the 2024 Legislative Yuan elections, the DPP lost its majority, the KMT became the largest party but without a majority, and the TPP became the pivotal minority. Since the Legislative Yuan convened in February 2024, it has been in a state of high confrontation — parliamentary reform bills, budget reviews, personnel confirmation votes, and constitutional interpretation proceedings have seen repeated battles between ruling and opposition camps.

Will this ruling-minority configuration persist in the 2026 local elections? Will local voters use local ballots to express their attitude toward central political confrontation? Or will local elections return to local issues, decoupling from central political confrontation? This is the most worth-tracking interpretive battlefield after the 2026 results come in.

Blue-White Cooperation Agreement

On March 18, 2026, two opposition parties passed a joint governance agreement, the contents of which include negotiated division of labor in certain counties and cities — public reporting mentions coordination mechanisms for New Taipei City, Chiayi City, and Yilan County¹¹. This agreement is a rare pre-election formalized institutional cooperation framework in Taiwan's multi-party competition history.

Past multi-party cooperation mostly appeared under informal labels such as "opposition integration" or "party negotiations," and often collapsed before the election due to individual candidate preferences. Writing the cooperation mechanism into an inter-party agreement document — regardless of its ultimate effectiveness — is a new institutional-level attempt. Whether the results of this attempt will become a template for future multi-party competition can only be assessed after the election results and their subsequent effects.

Civic Momentum After the 2025 Great Recall

The energy of 1.3 million signatures will not disappear the day the recall ends. Petition station experience, street mobilization networks, cross-organizational collaboration platforms, social media communication chains — these are fixed capital of civil society that will reappear in different forms in 2026. They may be new citizen groups, new election monitoring platforms, new issue advocacy organizations. How this civic momentum intertwines with party competition is another main thread for observing 2026.

The Expansion Trial of Third Forces

The TPP won 8 at-large seats in the 2024 legislative election, becoming the pivotal minority in the legislature. 2026 is the first time this third force contests local elections as the "pivotal third party in the legislature" — in the past, the TPP's organizational base at the local level was relatively weak, and 2026 is the critical test of whether it can convert its central-level support into local seats.

V. Structural Issues Across 22 Cities and Counties

Elections take place in cities and counties, but the political landscape of these jurisdictions was not formed in 2026. Each has its own factional structure, industrial history, ethnic composition, and geographic tension — these structures determine the motifs and tension fields of elections; candidates are the surface, structures are the bedrock.

The six special municipalities face common issues: population flow (continuous absorption from non-metropolitan areas), urban governance (transportation, housing, air pollution, waste, long-term care), and industrial transformation (manufacturing to services, traditional services to the AI era). But the tension fields differ greatly among the six — Taipei's housing prices and housing justice, New Taipei's satellite city governance, Taoyuan's Aerotropolis and large-scale development, Taichung's red-black factions and Central Science Park expansion, Tainan's historical preservation and tourism, Kaohsiung's petrochemical transition and port city regeneration.

The 16 counties (cities) have more localized issues:

Hsinchu (County and City) — Science Park population overflow, indigenous cultural preservation, political landscape differences between Hakka and Hoklo settlements
Miaoli — industrial transition from mining to tourism, Hakka political structure, population outflow
Changhua — aging issues in the western corridor, agricultural politics, coastal industrial zone (e.g., wind power) development controversies
Nantou — mountain tourism, continuation of post-921 earthquake reconstruction, indigenous tribal self-governance
Yunlin — factional structure of agricultural politics (the Chang family's influence extending from the provincial council to the present), air pollution issues, Formosa Plastics' Sixth Naphtha Cracker
Chiayi (County and City) — aging society, agricultural refinement, Alishan tourism and indigenous tribes
Pingtung — agricultural and fisheries politics, indigenous issues, Kenting tourism and the environment
Yilan — tourism saturation, in-migration, dual-city effect after the Hsuehshan Tunnel
Hualien — dual structure of local factions and indigenous tribal politics, eastern transportation construction controversies, post-earthquake reconstruction
Taitung — tourism seasonality, indigenous tribal self-governance, cross-sea cruises and the environment
Penghu — tourism seasonality, gambling referendum history, population loss
Kinmen — cross-strait relations (mini-three-links, military tension escalation and de-escalation), identity issues after the transition from wartime administration
Lienchiang (Matsu) — cross-strait relations, severe population outflow, archipelago governance of the Matsu Islands
Keelung — port transformation, satellite city positioning, Taipei-New Taipei-Keelung transportation integration

Each city and county has its own issue gravity field. Election results are snapshots of that gravity field at a particular moment, not outcomes generated from thin air.

See also: Geography Hub · 22 city and county article groups (the political landscape layer is a priority for the next EVOLVE supplement)

VI. The Historical Significance of Nine Categories of Office

The term "nine-in-one" may seem like merely nine types of elections bundled together, but each category of office has its own institutional history.

Special Municipality Mayors: The 4th Since the Six-Municipality Structure Stabilized

The office of special municipality mayor was born when Taipei was upgraded in 1967, expanded when Kaohsiung was upgraded in 1979, doubled with the five-municipality upgrade in 2010, and became today's six-municipality structure with Taoyuan's upgrade in 2014¹². 2026 is the 4th simultaneous election since the six-municipality structure stabilized — the institution has entered a steady state, but voters' expectations of the six special municipalities are structurally different from their expectations of the 16 counties (cities): the six are viewed as "quasi-central level," and candidates are often seen as potential contenders for the 2028 general election.

County (City) Mayors: The Political Landscape of 16 Non-Special-Municipality Jurisdictions

The 16 county (city) mayors of non-special-municipality jurisdictions — this number was largely established at the initial implementation of local self-governance in 1950¹³. Apart from the adjustment of the five-municipality upgrade in 2010, the political landscape of the 16 counties (cities) has not changed dramatically over the past half-century. The election results for these 16 positions often reflect the actual structure of Taiwan's grassroots politics more accurately than the six special municipalities — local factions, kinship networks, industry interests, religious networks.

Councilors: Continuation of the Single Non-Transferable Vote (SNTV) Multi-Member District System

The councilor system is different from the legislator system. Legislative Yuan members were changed to a single-district two-vote system (district + at-large) in 2008, but county (city) councilors and special municipality councilors remain under the Single Non-Transferable Vote (SNTV) multi-member district system — a district elects multiple members, each voter casts only one vote, and the highest vote-getters are elected in order¹⁴. SNTV is an old system formalized in 1992; legislators have already been reformed once, but the councilor system has not followed.

This system design encourages "intra-party competition" — candidates from the same party compete against each other in the same district. For voters, this system produces unique voting strategies: should one vote for the "marginal candidate" within the party who is most likely to lose? This is also why councilor elections feel completely different from presidential/legislative elections.

See also: 議員制度 (Councilor System)

Village (里) Chiefs: Taiwan's Most Grassroots Elected Executives

Taiwan has 7,748 village (里) chiefs — more than the 6,600+ 7-Eleven stores. The history of this office can be traced to the hokō (保甲) system during the Japanese colonial era, and it was directly renamed and inherited after the war¹⁵. The village chief election is the only office where independent candidates dominate — factions and personal connections matter more than party affiliation.

Village chief election results rarely make national media, but this office is the most grassroots interface of Taiwan's public services. Care for elderly living alone, garbage truck route disputes, community activity center management, neighborhood dispute mediation, senior citizen stipend distribution, government message delivery — all of these daily governance tasks rest with village chiefs.

See also: 村里長制度 (Village and 里 Chief System)

Indigenous District Mayors: An Institutional Response to Ensuring Self-Governance Is Not Sacrificed for Upgrades

The office of mountain indigenous district mayor in special municipalities was newly created when Taoyuan was upgraded in 2014¹⁶. The elected status of mountain township mayors would have been stripped upon upgrade to a special municipality (townships become appointed district directors after upgrade). To prevent indigenous self-governance from being swallowed by municipal restructuring, the Legislative Yuan passed amendments to the Local Government Act, creating this new office — mountain indigenous districts in special municipalities retain their self-governing elections. This is Taiwan's institutional response to "upgrades must not sacrifice indigenous self-governance."

Currently, 6 mountain indigenous districts (Wulai in New Taipei, Fuxin in Taoyuan, Heping in Taichung, Namasia in Kaohsiung, Taoyuan in Kaohsiung, Maolin in Kaohsiung) will elect district mayors and district representatives. The 50 district representative seats are not many, but the existence of this system itself is more important than the number of seats — it represents the commitment to Taiwan's multi-ethnic democratic framework.

See also: 直轄市山地原住民區長 (Mountain Indigenous District Mayors in Special Municipalities)

VII. Taiwan.md's Position in This Election

At this point, a clear self-declaration is necessary.

Taiwan.md does not cover campaigns.
Taiwan.md does not do breaking news.
Taiwan.md does not publish polls.
Taiwan.md does not endorse any candidate.
Taiwan.md does not comment on any party's nomination strategy.

Taiwan.md's work in the 2026 election operates on three layers:

Institutional Layer

Writing about how institutions grow, how they function, why they are designed this way, and when they break. The counterintuitive design of the Central Election Commission, the SNTV councilor system, the factional structure of village chiefs, the transparency design of political donation laws, the institutional function of the election gazette, the historical evolution of voting eligibility thresholds — these are the core content written into the Politics Hub.

Historical Layer

Placing this election on the thirty-year democratization coordinate to find its position. The first ballot for directly elected Taipei and Kaohsiung mayors in 1994, the five-municipality upgrade in 2010, the chaos of bundled referendums in 2018, the Kaohsiung mayor recall in 2022, the ruling-minority configuration in 2024, the Great Recall in 2025 — every historical node is a prequel to 2026.

Civic Monitoring Tool Layer

Cross-linking to the /elections/2026/ dynamic page, which collects candidate information, political donation visualization, multi-perspective analysis, and civic monitoring tool guides. The dynamic page and static articles divide labor: articles write "how institutions grow" (content that will be read for five years), while the dynamic page writes "the current situation is" (content updated as the campaign evolves).

Five Iron Rules

Every article written under the Politics category follows five iron rules (per the Politics Hub):

Symmetry Principle — Writing about a candidate means writing about the opponent; writing about a city/county means writing about all cities/counties. Asymmetric publishing = endorsement signal.
Institutional Layer First — Perspectives are locked to "why this institution is worth cherishing," "why democratic transition is not easy," "why transparency matters," and do not descend to the candidate-level or policy-stance level.
30-Day Pre-Election Spore Freeze — 30 days before the election (2026-10-29 → 11-28), publishing any candidate-specific spores is prohibited to avoid being read as an endorsement during the pre-election viral period.
AI Deepfake Defense — Every article goes through a complete hallucination audit + story atom audit + cross-source verification.
Three-Filter Self-Application — Default bonus for creators / multi-observer drift / editorial voice / external critique default not executed.

These five iron rules are not restrictions written for readers to see; they are commitments written for ourselves. If you read anything that feels wrong — feel free to file an Issue / PR / comment. This is how Taiwan.md evolves together with its readers.

VIII. Reading Paths for Readers

Depending on what you want to know, this category has different entry points.

To understand how the system works:
九合一選舉是什麼 (What Are the Nine-in-One Elections) → 投票權門檻歷史 (History of Voting Eligibility Thresholds) → 中選會制度 (Central Election Commission System) → 選舉公報 (Election Gazette) → 政治獻金透明度 (Political Donation Transparency) → 議員制度 (Councilor System) → 村里長制度 (Village and 里 Chief System) → 直轄市山地原住民區長 (Mountain Indigenous District Mayors in Special Municipalities)

To see the latest on the 2026 elections:
/elections/2026/ — dashboard / candidates / political donations / multi-perspective analysis

For historical context:
Democratization → Taiwan's Democratic Transition → The Great Recall Movement (2024–2025) → Taiwan Elections and Party Politics

For civic monitoring tools:
Open Source Community and g0v → 政治獻金透明度 (Political Donation Transparency) → External resource compilation (/elections/2026/)

To understand the political context of a specific city or county:
Geography Hub → the city or county you care about → the political landscape section of that city or county (Tier 1.2 supplement pending ship)

IX. Key Dates to Watch

From today (2026-05-27) to election day (2026-11-28), there are six months remaining. The following are key dates worth tracking:

2026/08/20 Central Election Commission announcement — Election administration officially begins. From this day, the 18-month "speculation phase" enters statutory procedure.

2026/08-29–09/04 Candidate registration — The final candidate list emerges. Opposition integration agreements, blue-white cooperation, third-force expansion, independent coordination — the results of all pre-election maneuvering will be revealed in these six days. Candidates who do not register by this day can no longer enter the race.

2026/10/16 Candidate qualification review + 2026/10/23 Number lottery — The number lottery determines the order of candidates on the ballot. In Taiwan's election culture, the subtle influence of candidate numbers (especially the "first-mover effect" of number 1) may affect a small number of voters.

2026/10/29 → 11/28 — The 30 days before the election:

Poll publication ban period (per the Election and Recall Act)
Taiwan.md activates candidate-specific spore freeze
Ministry of Justice election investigations enter peak alert status
Expected peak period for cognitive warfare (per OpenAI / DoubleThink Lab analysis)

2026/11/28 Election day — Voting from 08:00–16:00, counting begins after 16:00. Taiwan's vote-counting tradition is "fast but not sloppy" — major results are expected to be tallied between 22:00–24:00 that evening.

After 2026/12/01 — The political interpretive battlefield after results are announced. Beyond the specific vote counts of who won and lost, how the 2024 ruling-minority configuration continues or reconfigures, expectations for the 2028 general election landscape, and the subsequent trajectory of blue-white cooperation — these "post-election narratives" may be more important than the election results themselves.

Closing

At 8:00 AM on Saturday, November 28, 2026, all 22 cities and counties across Taiwan will simultaneously open their polling stations. From that moment until 4:00 PM, Taiwan's voters will complete, in eight hours, this democratic ritual of "nine categories of office voted on in a single day" — a rarity in the world.

But the real stress test of this ritual is not on that day alone — it is in the 18 months before the election, in an environment of escalating AI cognitive warfare, amid political confrontation under a ruling-minority configuration, at the seams between civic monitoring tools and open government data, and in every stream of messages whose truth is difficult to discern.

Can Taiwan's democratic infrastructure withstand this stress test?

The answer will not be revealed on election day alone. The answer is being built, inch by inch, in every institution, every civic tool, every fact-checking organization, and every citizen willing to take the time to verify information.

Taiwan.md's position in this stress test: curation at the institutional layer, historical layer, and civic monitoring tool layer. We do not cover campaigns, but we document the environment in which this election takes place. Written for someone five years in the future who wants to understand why 2026 was a critical node.

🧬

v1.0 | 2026-05-27 | Born from the ARTICLE-INBOX 🗳️ 2026 Election Series anchor article mission. Provides the curatorial general chapter narrative for the Politics Hub beyond the /elections/2026/ dynamic page.

References

2026 Republic of China Local Official Elections — Wikipedia — Nine categories of office totaling approximately 11,000+ elected executives and representatives↩
Central Election Commission — Statutory election authority; all seat figures subject to CEC announcement↩
China's "AI Manipulation of Public Opinion" Interfering in Taiwan Elections — Fount Media's summary of the OpenAI February 2026 report↩
Citizen Lab Reveals Global Operation of Spoofed News Websites — Citizen Lab, University of Toronto↩
Summary: Four Key Priorities for 2026 Election Investigations — United Daily News report on Ministry of Justice investigation directions↩
Xi Jinping Targets 2028 to Block Lai's Reelection, Treats 2026 as Preliminary Battle — Japan's Yomiuri Shimbun report↩
The Institutional Design Behind Taiwan's Vote-Counting Speed — Official source for the institutional design behind Taiwan's vote-counting speed↩
History of Directly Elected Special Municipality Mayors in Taiwan — From the first direct elections in Taipei and Kaohsiung in 1994 to Taoyuan's upgrade in 2014↩
Largest Recall Campaign in History — Newtalk report on the total signature count for the 2025 Great Recall↩
The Rise of AI in Chinese Influence Operations — Nine Key Points from Zhongke Tianji Documents — DoubleThink Lab, Taiwan↩
KMT and TPP Pass Joint Governance Agreement — United Daily News report on the March 18, 2026 KMT-TPP joint governance agreement↩
History of Taiwan's Special Municipality System — Institutional evolution from Taipei's upgrade in 1967 to Taoyuan's upgrade in 2014↩
History of Local Self-Governance in Taiwan — The 16-county/city framework from the 1950s onward↩
Single Non-Transferable Vote (SNTV) — Official source for the Single Non-Transferable Vote (SNTV) system↩
Village (里) System from Japanese-Era Hokō to Postwar Evolution — Official source for the village (里) system from Japanese-era hokō to postwar evolution↩
Mountain Indigenous District Self-Governance System in Special Municipalities — Taiwan Ministry of Justice Law and Regulation Database, Local Government Act §§83-2 to 83-8↩